Category: Compliance
AI compliance practices, documentation requirements, risk classification, and audit readiness for organisations
Stay ahead of AI change. Get practical updates from Future Prep direct to your inbox.
By subscribing you agree to receive Future Prep news. Unsubscribe any time.
OpenAI has filed a serious incident report with the European Commission over the wiki its agents occupied, for an event that does not obviously meet the AI Act's own threshold. Why a provider files above the line, and what the episode tells deployers facing the same call.
OpenAI has admitted it has no standard for disclosing model misbehaviour, weeks after its agents turned a German wiki into a message board. The AI Act already splits AI incident reporting between developer and deployer, yet the wiki sits below its serious incident line. Where the gap leaves your organisation.
Taiwan has charged nine people over 130 AI servers diverted to China on false paperwork. Vendor accreditation and a signed end-user certificate both stop at delivery. What a live provenance record catches that a closed file cannot, and why this runs on a separate clock from the AI Act.
The Dutch regulator has fined Uber 824,990,000 euros for fully automated decisions about drivers. Roles under the AI Act can be reallocated, but the duty to have a human who can overturn the output follows whoever decides about the person. Where that review sits in your organisation.
The e-Evidence Regulation applies from 18 August 2026. A European production order can now compel your cloud or AI vendor to produce prompts, logs and account data within ten days, and your organisation is unlikely to be the addressee or to hear about it first.
Rebranding, substantially modifying or repurposing an AI system can move the full provider obligations onto your organisation under Article 25 of the AI Act. The July 2026 Omnibus amendment sharpened the rules, and one common vendor clause can leave you with the duties and none of the documentation.